Today 07/30/2010
Read Doug Hoyes' Recent Tweets
Bankruptcy Ontario: Free Information about Bankruptcy in Ontario

Archive for the ‘bankruptcy mediation’ Category

Child support & surplus income calculation

Saturday, December 5th, 2009

Question: I filed for bankruptcy in April 09 and reported my family income to include 3 people in the household (2 kids and myself). At the time of filing, I did not receive any child support due to my ex refusing to pay such support. In May, the court ruled that my ex will have to pay me the child support, and back dated this support to a year ago when we separated. So, since May, my ex is paying child support ($140 per month), but is doubling up on this amount ($280), to catch up on the previous years’ lack of payments. This extra $280 dollars per month has now pushed me over the limit of income for 3 people, and a week ago, I received a letter from my bankruptcy trustees, saying they cannot discharge me, for my income exceeded the maximum level and that I now owe them an extra ~$1500 before they will discharge me.

It is thus clearly that the child support I started receiving in May, has caused the “inflated” surplus income. 1) As I provided my monthly income/expenses to the trustees, could they not point this issue out to me, requiring me to pay more on a monthly basis, 2) as half of this money is “arrears” payments, is this not a bit unfair .. I supported my children for a year without child support, and now that the court had ruled for me to receive the payments, I am penalized by the trustee?

What can I do .. I really do think this is unfair for I just do not have the $1500 they now claim from me in order to discharge me.

Please help!
Thank you

Answer: All trustees are required to tabulate your income each month, and if you are over the limit you are required to pay half of that amount each month as surplus income. Your trustee should have performed this calculation each month, and they should have informed you each month of the amount owing. If they did, it would have been easier to make the payments each month. It appears that they didn’t tell you what was owing until your bankruptcy was almost over, by which time you have significant arrears.

You have a few choices.

First, talk to your trustee and ask them if there is any way to make payment arrangements. Have they charged you fees in addition to your surplus income payments (most trustees do), and can they reduce those fees to allow you to catch up?

Second, you could request mediation, where a representative of the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy and your trustee will meet with you to review the surplus income calculation, and explore alternatives.

Finally, you can request that your trustee schedule a discharge hearing in bankruptcy court. This will give you an opportunity to appear in court and explain your side of the matter to the bankruptcy judge; the judge has the power to change the amount owing, or to give you payment terms to complete the payments.

The lesson here is that if you are filing bankruptcy, you should ask your trustee up front how they will communicate your surplus income obligations. Good trustees will do the calculation every month, and inform you of the amount owing each month, so you don’t fall into arrears.

surplus income and length of bankruptcy in Ontario

Monday, April 20th, 2009

Question: Hi, I read through the recent posts on surplus income and wanted to know in Ontario, if one has significant surplus income, how long beyond the 9 months will the bankruptcy be extended? Is there a general rule of thumb as to how many months it will be extended? Can a bankrupt mediate an agreement with a trustee or challenge the extension in court?

Answer: There is no general rule of thumb. If the surplus is a few hundred dollars per month the trustee and the bankrupt may agree to a “deemed opposition” where the bankruptcy is extended for a few months. If the surplus is significant the court can extend the bankruptcy for a further 12 months or more.

The bankrupt can request mediation to discuss the issue, and the bankrupt does have the right to appear at a discharge hearing in court to present their case before the judge.

If you expect to have significant surplus income, a better alternative is to file a consumer proposal and avoid the bankruptcy altogether.

It should also be noted that under proposed new rules if you have surplus income your bankruptcy will be automatically extended to a minimum of 21 months, so a consumer proposal may be an even more important bankruptcy alternative in the future.

Who is included in the number of persons in a household to calculate the threshhold amount?

Wednesday, March 11th, 2009

Question: I am trying to help a friend manage through the bankruptcy process. Her threshold income (for surplus income purposes) amount seems to have been set at the level for 2 people ($2300 or so) but she is supporting a daughter in university too. Shouldn’t she be included too?

Perhaps now that my friend is in bankruptcy, her daughter’s student loan entitlement will go up…? Actually, her daughter’s university costs contributed to putting my friend in this spot – she worked multiple jobs to help fund university – which raised her income so her daughter wasn’t eligible for much in the way of student loans; because the daughter didn’t get enough student loans, my friend had to work more; which further reduced the student loan eligibility – and so on into a downward spiral! Now that my friend has fallen into bankruptcy, it would seem that there’s still this problem because the threshold seems to be excluding helping her daughter. It looks like her daughter may have to drop out – which would be a tragedy for them all. So – is it right that her daughter in university doesn’t count in the threshold amount even though my friend has to pay for her rent, food, clothing and other expenses?

Answer: The surplus income threshold is based on the “family unit”. In most cases a child attending university, who is supported by the family, remains a part of the family unit, and therefore yes, she probably should be included.

We suggest your friend raise this issue with the bankruptcy trustee (who may not even be aware of the daughter at university). If the trustee does not agree with this approach, the bankrupt has the right to request mediation as a starting point to resolving the matter.

bankruptcy mediation

Wednesday, February 11th, 2009

Question: Hi, if you have surplus income, and are paying the trustee $650 every month, will the trustee automatically extend the bankruptcy by 12 months? If I seek mediation, is it like that the trustee can meet half way for extending it 6 months? I have heard horror stories about people being bankrupt for 2-3 years because their trustee kept extending their bankruptcy.

Answer: As of February 2009, if the bankrupt is paying $650 per month in surplus income payments, it is standard practice for a trustee to extend the bankruptcy for 12 months. However, the bankrupt person has two options:

First, they can request mediation. In mediation, the bankrupt can make the case for paying a lesser amount. Ultimately the mediator does not make a decision; it is still the trustee’s decision.

The second option is to request a discharge hearing in bankruptcy court. The bankrupt can give reasons why their bankruptcy should not extend for an extra twelve months. The trustee, and any creditor, can also present their opinions. Ultimately, the bankruptcy registrar or judge will decide.

It should also be noted that under new bankruptcy rules, which as of today have not yet become law, if you are a first time bankrupt and if you have surplus income, you will be automatically bankrupt for 21 months, so it is likely that even if you went to court today your bankruptcy would last for 21 months. Your trustee, or a bankruptcy lawyer, can provide you with more details.